User Tools

Site Tools


cn:about:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
cn:about:start [2018/05/15 00:37]
chinger1313 [Data Leakage]
cn:about:start [2018/05/15 00:41]
chinger1313 [Censorship]
Line 39: Line 39:
   * While not technically a back-door, being forced into firmware changes is a concern. An alternate approach might be to guarantee that there are at least two firmware versions available for all products, so that in the event of concerns that are believed to be firmware related, that a pilot will at least have the chance to eliminate firmware as the root cause by downgrading to a different firmware level.   * While not technically a back-door, being forced into firmware changes is a concern. An alternate approach might be to guarantee that there are at least two firmware versions available for all products, so that in the event of concerns that are believed to be firmware related, that a pilot will at least have the chance to eliminate firmware as the root cause by downgrading to a different firmware level.
   * From a change management and risk mitigation perspective, providing no downgrade options at all is a safety hazard.   * From a change management and risk mitigation perspective, providing no downgrade options at all is a safety hazard.
 +  * 人们已经发现,收去申请Android和IOS后门让收热补丁应用程序的方式违反了规则对谷歌和苹果都收。9)热修补的实践本质上允许收完全改变收的功能应用程序没有一个试点的知识或同意。将其置于不同的背景下,热补丁就相当于一架飞机的航空电子软件完全取代了中段飞行。在这一点上,DJI一直信守诺言。到目前为止,分析确认了从最近的DJI更新中移除JSPatch和Tinker。虽然从技术上讲不是后门,但被强制转换成固件是令人担忧的。另一种方法可能是保证至少有两个固件版本的所有产品,所以在担心被认为是固件相关,飞行员将至少有机会消除根源的固件降级到不同的固件级别。从变更管理和风险缓解的角度来看,不提供降级选项是一种安全隐患。
 ===== Censorship ===== ===== Censorship =====
   * In DJI forums, it is against the rules to criticise DJI, or to talk about reverse engineering of DJI software. ((Threads  and posts arguing about company policies are not allowed, No content promoting the unauthorized modification.[[http://forum.dji.com/forum.php?mod=redirect&goto=findpost&ptid=71515&pid=623185&fromuid=836559|Forum Rules]]))   * In DJI forums, it is against the rules to criticise DJI, or to talk about reverse engineering of DJI software. ((Threads  and posts arguing about company policies are not allowed, No content promoting the unauthorized modification.[[http://forum.dji.com/forum.php?mod=redirect&goto=findpost&ptid=71515&pid=623185&fromuid=836559|Forum Rules]]))
   * In third party forums sponsored by DJI, similar censorship is taking place for those that discuss topics that are not endorsed by DJI.   * In third party forums sponsored by DJI, similar censorship is taking place for those that discuss topics that are not endorsed by DJI.
   * **DJI have recently removed their "NO UNAUTH MODIFICATIONS" warning in the forums. However, the policy has not changed. Lets hope DJI can continue in this direction, and review their forum rules to encourage a user community, instead of oppressing it.**   * **DJI have recently removed their "NO UNAUTH MODIFICATIONS" warning in the forums. However, the policy has not changed. Lets hope DJI can continue in this direction, and review their forum rules to encourage a user community, instead of oppressing it.**
 +  * 在DJI论坛中,批评DJI或讨论DJI软件的逆向工程是违反规则的。10)在DJI赞助的第三方论坛中,类似的审查正在为那些讨论不被DJI认可的话题进行。DJI最近在论坛上删除了他们的NO UNAUTH修改警告。然而,该政策并未改变。让我们希望DJI能够继续这个方向,并回顾他们的论坛规则,鼓励用户社区,而不是压迫它。
 ===== Safety ===== ===== Safety =====
   * DJI has recently rushing out multiple updates and patches to prevent reverse engineering.   * DJI has recently rushing out multiple updates and patches to prevent reverse engineering.
cn/about/start.txt · Last modified: 2018/05/15 00:44 by chinger1313